On March 10, 2011, the world-famous auction house SOTHEBY’S sold a pair of wall sconces wrongly assigned to Emile-Jacques Ruhlmann. We fixed this!
At DOCANTIC, we investigate the proper identification of 20th Century furniture, and provide accurate documentation. Here’s an example from our case files!
SOTHEBY'S got pulled over by the PATROL!
Ladies and gentlemen, the story you are about to read is true. Some names have been changed to protect the innocents.
Case Report: File No. 8721, New York City
On a dismal Thursday evening in the ides of March, 2011, the hammer came down hard to everyone’s ignorant delight and approval at SOTHEBY’S hide-out in the Big Apple’s elegant auction district. “Sold!” Mr. X, the initial buyer and first victim, briskly walked away ecstatic over his winning bid of $35K (buyer’s premium included) for Lot 69 – a pair of 1925 bronze Art Deco wall sconces designed by the famous Emile-Jacques Ruhlmann. The drizzle and conceit thickened as he packed up his prize for a quick get-away, unaware of the grieve that would await him.
Mere moments later, the second mark, Mrs. Y – whose identity has also been hidden to protect her from the truth – also succumbed to a similar fate. The exact same scenario, again, occurred within the reputed safety of SOTHEBY’S New York City auction house. Like other suckers before her, she fell for the ruse of a headline offering another coveted pair of Emile-Jacques Ruhlmann wall sconces – Lot 70, displayed in the auction catalog. (Exhibit 1 & 2, below) The ill-fated dame shelled out $25,000 (buyer’s premium included) for her treasured lights. Sadly, she and her counterpart collector Mr. X might not even know, to this day, what hit ‘em.
DOCANTIC patrols the market to make sure that 20th Century furniture, and works of art receive proper attribution, and accurate documentation, so that collectors may sell and/or purchase works at the correct price. Protect and serve the art community, that’s our job!
Exhibit 1 & 2
Once the rain dried and the checks cleared, in actuality, the two victims each held in their possession a pair of sconces from circa 1952 designed by the lesser-known (although amazingly talented) Henri Delisle, and valued at less than $650! The switch had occurred right under everyone’s eyes. And the loss of their hard-earned stash on mere ornaments was unforgivable!
One year later, June 2012, the PHILLIPS auction house attempted to reenact the same nefarious incident that occurred in SOTHEBY’S corridors with the exact same product: Mrs. Y’s Lot 70. (Exhibit 3). But they bungled the job royal.
Like SOTHEBY’S, PHILLIPS displayed new photos of the auction items, but added reference pages in their catalog from late art books that SOTHEBY’S had overlooked (perhaps intentionally), “…for similar examples” by Emile-Jacques Ruhlmann. (Exhibit 4)
Exhibit 3 & 4
In the months leading up to the little known ‘Hammer Case’, though hard to believe, PHILLIPS had hidden the weapon in plain site. Neither their unsuspecting appraisers nor their sellers or clients-with-money-to-burn had spotted what the cameras caught. Their own auction catalogs blatantly listed 27 book references (including repeats), 6 pages of which showed 9 photos of Emile-Jacques Ruhlmann’s sconces …that bore absolutely NO resemblance to the Delisle sconces offered for sale! (Exhibit 5, below)
In reality, NONE of the Emile-Jacques Ruhlmann lamps matched the later Delisle-design sconces up for auction! Unashamed scandal. The misattributed PHILLIPS Lot 27 failed to sell, for lack of interest. Some savvy buyers may have had finally done their homework. A disappointment – if not a wake up call – for Mrs. Y. This time, another botched auction sale was luckily averted by providence …and perhaps by evident documentation errors. Plain as day! (Especially, to DOCANTIC.)
Never at ease to just compare mug shot photos, our man in New York had to examine the proof for himself. Going into the investigation, he painstakingly put his hands on an authentic pair of hard-to-find Emile-Jacques Ruhlmann sconces, whose photos PHILLIPS had only referenced (the infamous page 91 in Florence Camard’s 1983 book titled Ruhlmann)! He needed to be 100% sure of any errors.
Upon close, hand-held examination of 30 or more design traits during lockdown, he determined the only 2 similarities between the genuine article and the set PHILLIPS wanted to fence are that they both: 1) hang on a wall, and 2) give light. You judge for yourself if the auction item in question looks anything like the confiscated original in our possession, listed by PHILLIPS as “similar.” Ha! (Exhibit 6 …And we’re talking 30 grand worth of ‘similar’!)
Because, piteously, poor Mr. Ruhlmann could not even defend his own sullied reputation, we did it for him. Our records show that he had already died almost 2 decades before he had supposedly created circa 1952 Delisle sconces that SOTHEBY’S and PHILLIPS claimed bore his name! (Exhibit 7•)
Suspecting that something was amiss, we reopened the case in June 2015 to collect the above exhibits. The PATROL detectives – based in Los Angeles (with a strong French connection) – conducted an undercover operation on the dubious items sold (and the attempted repeat sale). Our nitpicky investigators dug into DOCANTIC’s database of genuine period mugshots and came up with a different alias for the very sconces: Henri Delisle! (Exhibit 8)
They then sent the potential decoys – with solid written documentation, designer attribution, and photographic evidence – to 10 known art appraisers for unbiased valuation. After 2 weeks, matching results came back that placed the Delisle lights at a low value range between $550-650. (Exhibit 9)
Then, the undercover agents sent this ‘unnamed’ & ‘undated’ bait (without the verified evidence) to 6 unsuspicious suspects, including alleged online art experts; and, to the crime scene itself, SOTHEBY’S. On one end of the alley, a couple joints assigned the ‘unnamed’ sconces only 20% of their actual value ($120). Lower than low!
On the other end of the Upper East Side, instead of hard research work, SOTHEBY’S 20th Century Decorative Arts Department resorted to their old alibi, and typical MO: previous sales history. We guess they searched their past dockets and fabricated an attribution to Emile-Jacques Ruhlmann, with most probably an estimate between $25,000 – $35,000. Higher than high. (Exhibit 10)
It seems they had extracted their proffered expert testimony from the case of the 2011 sales by their unfortunate clients. …Maybe the gullible Mr. X and Mrs. Y got what they had coming to them – pairs of misattributed sconces mislabeled at over 100 times their actual value! …
Our nitpicky investigators, had once again, compiled all the above documents and exhibits to bring the facts to light. The clouds parted and the sun began to shine again over 1334 York Avenue, NYC. Case closed.
Whether he was in on the SOTHEBY’S take or not, the sconce seller made out like a bandit. In theory, he raked in almost 30 grand in profit. The auction house didn’t do too bad either on their commission. But pity the poor buyers, when they turned around to PHILLIPS to resell their prize. They got the surprise of their lives! Overvalued sconces, busted.
If it weren’t for DOCANTIC’s exhaustive archives of literature on 20th Century Furniture and Art, the truth would never had been known.
Art appraisers, auction houses, dealers, collectors, buyers, sellers, and the uniformed press would just go on strolling down the street, whistling in blissful ignorance. But our gumshoes go patrol the dirty streets of the market to defend, serve and protect the art community. We dig up the proper attribution and accurate documentation, so collectors may sell and/or purchase works at the correct price. That’s our job!
“It’s about the facts, m’am, just the facts.” Accurate identification and documentation will secure a trustworthy valuation! Not over- or under-priced. To protect the pieces you value, interrogate the gigantic DOCANTIC database.
This is the city: Los Angeles, California. I work here. I’m Raymond Chandelier, the PATROL‘s Bounty Hunter. I eat art delinquents for lunch.
• Emile Jaques Ruhlmann in 1925 ILLUSTRATION: From the book 'RUHLMANN' by Florence CAMARD/RIZZOLI
Book ’em! The auction house or the art dealer provided little or no corroborating evidence in the form of documentation for this item.
Time Off! The expert made a significant mistake on this item. His attributed period came in way off. No early parole!
Missing persons alert! The auction house or the art dealer failed to uncover and identify the artist for this item.
Identity theft! They’re guilty of the worst crime of all: mislabeling the artist with another alias. And Picasso painted the Mona Lisa, right?!
The obsessive, nitpicky and no-holds-barred investigative team at DOCANTIC maintains an unparalleled database of original documentation for 20th Century, Art Nouveau, and Art Deco & Design furniture and works of art.
At DOCANTIC we believe that designers deserve proper identification for each work they have created, and that any art lover should confidently pay the right price for his or her purchase. We see the art world filled with both talented artists and con artist and, therefore, also riddled with innumerable attribution errors and outrageous pricing mistakes. By supplying authentic period photographs, DOCANTIC catches and apprehends the undervaluation (or overvaluation) of furniture and works of art. That’s our mission. We stop errors dead in their tracks. We serve and protect 20th Century furniture’s reputation.
Headquartered in Los Angeles, DOCANTIC sets the bar for the identification of 20th Century furniture, and shares with every art lover the information that has been kept under wraps by a handful of experts for far too long!